18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Yokohama (58%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin Primacy 4+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Primacy 4+ also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Number of tests
6
13
Best position
#6
#1
Average position
11.8
4.3
Latest test
2020
2025
Available sizes
12
123

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison