Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Upper-middle

Yokohama

Bluearth AE-50

R14 – R19

VS

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Bluearth AE-50

e.Primacy

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

6

4

15

Best position

#6

#3

#2

Average position

11.8

12.0

9.0

Latest test

2020

2025

Available sizes

12

111

225

Wet

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet braking

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Wet circle cornering

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet handling

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

45%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Dry

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Dry braking

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry driving behavior

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Comfort

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Costs

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Rolling resistance

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Bluearth AE-50

e.Primacy

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison