18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
10
3
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
11.8
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2020
2026
2026
Available sizes
12
104
40

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison