18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Yokohama (58%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Number of tests
6
13
Best position
#6
#2
Average position
11.8
6.2
Latest test
2020
2026
Available sizes
12
530

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison