18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

Yokohama

Bluearth AE-50

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Yokohama (58%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2025 when was the Hankook ION Evo first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Hankook ION Evo also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Yokohama

Bluearth AE-50

Hankook

ION Evo

Number of tests

6

1

Best position

#6

#1

Average position

11.8

1.0

Latest test

2020

2025

Available sizes

12

64

Wet

Wet

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

63%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet circle cornering

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

70%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

71%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Dry

Dry

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

78%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

93%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Comfort

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

85%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

85%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Costs

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

79%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

79%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison