18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
3
3
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
11.8
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2020
2026
2025
Available sizes
12
40
34

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry steering response
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison