18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
5
1
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
11.8
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
12
63
64

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison