Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Yokohama

Bluearth AE-50

R14 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Bluearth AE-50

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

3

Best position

#6

#3

#2

Average position

11.8

4.7

3.7

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

Available sizes

12

146

34

Wet

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

45%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dry

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

93%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bluearth AE-50

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison