18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Number of tests
6
3
13
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
11.8
3.7
4.3
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
12
34
123

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Dry steering response
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison