18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50Upper-middle
YokohamaYokohama

Bluearth AE-50

R14 – R19
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
3
1
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
11.8
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
12
34
64

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison