18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
6
3
6
Best position
#6
#2
#3
Average position
11.8
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2020
2025
2026
Available sizes
12
34
146

Wet

Wet
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
63%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet circle cornering
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Dry

Dry
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
86%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison