18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

Yokohama

Bluearth AE-50

VS

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Yokohama (58%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2023 when was the Falken e.Ziex first tested.

Test Profile

Yokohama

Bluearth AE-50

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

3

Best position

#6

#2

Average position

11.8

3.7

Latest test

2020

2025

Available sizes

12

34

Wet

Wet

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

63%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

71%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

90%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

70%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dry

Dry

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

86%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

78%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry steering response

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Comfort

Comfort

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Costs

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

79%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

79%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison