Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Vredestein

ULTRAC

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ULTRAC

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

—

4

3

1

Best position

—

#3

#2

#1

Average position

—

12.0

3.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

—

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

111

40

34

64

Wet

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Vredestein ULTRAC

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein ULTRAC

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet side guide

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Vredestein ULTRAC

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Vredestein ULTRAC

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry lane changing

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Comfort

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Vredestein ULTRAC

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Vredestein ULTRAC

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Offroad

Vredestein ULTRAC

76%

Costs

Vredestein ULTRAC

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein ULTRAC

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Vredestein ULTRAC

29%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

ULTRAC

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Offroad

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison