18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Let's compare two popular summer tyres; the Vredestein ULTRAC and the Kumho Ecsta HS52.


The Vredestein ULTRAC, manufactured in HU and coming as first equipment on BMW 2-series Active Tourers, ranked 4th in the Autobild test out of 51 tyres. The evaluation highlighted excellent driving dynamics and short wet and dry braking distances. Notably, the tyre exhibited very good aquaplaning properties, which can enhance safety and control during summer rain storms. However, drawbacks included lower tyre lifespan due to increased tread wear and higher rolling resistance, which could imply less fuel economy.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, an upgrade from the previous Kumho Ecsta HS51, outperformed the Vredestein taking the 3rd position in the Autobild test. The HS52 excelled particularly in dry braking, dry handling, wet braking, and price/value ratio. Despite the lack of indication of where this tyre is made, it got noticed favourably for favourable mileage and wet circle cornering capability in the ADAC test, where it also ranked 3rd out of 16 tyres.


Crucially, the Ecsta HS52 performed very well in wet conditions as noted by TyreReviews.com, offering good dry handling, short dry braking distances, good aquaplaning resistance and impressively, had low external noise. The only notable weakness was the average wet grip.


Comparatively, the Vredestein ULTRAC offered superior wet handling, aquaplaning resistance and good dry braking, though was criticised for high rolling resistance and external noise.


Overall, both tyres show strengths and weaknesses. While the Vredestein ULTRAC offers impressive wet and dry performance, its shortened lifespan and higher rolling resistance may affect long term usability and fuel costs. The Kumho Ecsta HS52, whilst not as strong in wet grip conditions, makes up for it with remarkable dry performance, long predicted lifespan, and general fuel efficiency. Given that it also came in higher on most test rankings and the better price/value ratio, the HS52 might be the better overall option.


Learn more about these tyres at their respective manufacturer pages, Vredestein and Kumho.

Test Profile

Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
3
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
40
34

Wet

Wet
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Offroad

Offroad
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein ULTRAC
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison