18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Let's compare two popular summer tyres; the Vredestein ULTRAC and the Kumho Ecsta HS52.


The Vredestein ULTRAC, manufactured in HU and coming as first equipment on BMW 2-series Active Tourers, ranked 4th in the Autobild test out of 51 tyres. The evaluation highlighted excellent driving dynamics and short wet and dry braking distances. Notably, the tyre exhibited very good aquaplaning properties, which can enhance safety and control during summer rain storms. However, drawbacks included lower tyre lifespan due to increased tread wear and higher rolling resistance, which could imply less fuel economy.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, an upgrade from the previous Kumho Ecsta HS51, outperformed the Vredestein taking the 3rd position in the Autobild test. The HS52 excelled particularly in dry braking, dry handling, wet braking, and price/value ratio. Despite the lack of indication of where this tyre is made, it got noticed favourably for favourable mileage and wet circle cornering capability in the ADAC test, where it also ranked 3rd out of 16 tyres.


Crucially, the Ecsta HS52 performed very well in wet conditions as noted by TyreReviews.com, offering good dry handling, short dry braking distances, good aquaplaning resistance and impressively, had low external noise. The only notable weakness was the average wet grip.


Comparatively, the Vredestein ULTRAC offered superior wet handling, aquaplaning resistance and good dry braking, though was criticised for high rolling resistance and external noise.


Overall, both tyres show strengths and weaknesses. While the Vredestein ULTRAC offers impressive wet and dry performance, its shortened lifespan and higher rolling resistance may affect long term usability and fuel costs. The Kumho Ecsta HS52, whilst not as strong in wet grip conditions, makes up for it with remarkable dry performance, long predicted lifespan, and general fuel efficiency. Given that it also came in higher on most test rankings and the better price/value ratio, the HS52 might be the better overall option.


Learn more about these tyres at their respective manufacturer pages, Vredestein and Kumho.

Test Profile

Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
18
Best position
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
6.1
Latest test
2026
2024
Available sizes
104
47

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Wet Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
61%
Wet Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Wet Circle Cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning Cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
80%
Dry Performance
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Dry Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
54%
Comfort & Noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Noise Exterior
Vredestein ULTRAC
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Noise Interior
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Ride Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
86%
Economy
Vredestein ULTRAC
44%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
96%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison