18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Vredestein ULTRAC

Vredestein

ULTRAC

VS

Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Vredestein

ULTRAC

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

3

3

Best position

—

#2

#2

Average position

—

3.3

3.7

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

60

34

Wet

Wet

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Vredestein ULTRAC

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein ULTRAC

93%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Dry

Vredestein ULTRAC

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Vredestein ULTRAC

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry lane changing

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Comfort

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Vredestein ULTRAC

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Vredestein ULTRAC

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Offroad

Offroad

Vredestein ULTRAC

76%

Costs

Costs

Vredestein ULTRAC

56%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein ULTRAC

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Vredestein ULTRAC

29%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison