18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Vredestein ULTRAC

Vredestein

ULTRAC

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Vredestein

ULTRAC

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

1

3

Best position

—

#1

#2

Average position

—

1.0

3.7

Latest test

—

2025

2025

Available sizes

—

64

34

Wet

Wet

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Vredestein ULTRAC

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein ULTRAC

93%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Dry

Vredestein ULTRAC

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Vredestein ULTRAC

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry lane changing

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Comfort

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Vredestein ULTRAC

72%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Vredestein ULTRAC

81%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Offroad

Offroad

Vredestein ULTRAC

76%

Costs

Costs

Vredestein ULTRAC

56%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein ULTRAC

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Vredestein ULTRAC

29%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison