Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Vredestein

ULTRAC

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ULTRAC

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

—

3

4

1

5

Best position

—

#2

#3

#1

Average position

—

3.3

12.0

1.0

2.2

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

40

111

64

63

Wet

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet handling

Vredestein ULTRAC

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein ULTRAC

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Vredestein ULTRAC

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Vredestein ULTRAC

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry lane changing

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Comfort

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Vredestein ULTRAC

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Vredestein ULTRAC

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Interior noise

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Offroad

Vredestein ULTRAC

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Costs

Vredestein ULTRAC

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein ULTRAC

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Vredestein ULTRAC

29%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ULTRAC

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Offroad

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison