18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Vredestein ULTRAC Premium
VredesteinVredestein

ULTRAC

1.6
R15 – R21
Falken ZIEX ZE320Upper-middle
FalkenFalken

ZIEX ZE320

6.6
R15 – R18
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken
ZIEX ZE320
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
—
5
3
Best position
—
#3
#2
Average position
—
6.4
3.3
Latest test
—
2026
2026
Available sizes
—
43
60

Wet

Wet
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
98%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
72%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Interior noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
1%

Offroad

Offroad
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein ULTRAC
56%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Falken ZIEX ZE320
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison