18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
3
15
Best position
#2
#1
Average position
3.7
1.2
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
34
122

Wet

Wet
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Wet braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Wet handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Wet side guide
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Dry handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Dry lane changing
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Dry steering response
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Offroad

Offroad
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein ULTRAC
56%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison