18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Vredestein Ultrac ProPremium
VredesteinVredestein

Ultrac Pro

7.2
R18 – R22
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
8
3
15
Best position
#3
#2
#2
Average position
8.0
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
64
60
225

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2025225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison