18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Vredestein Ultrac ProPremium
VredesteinVredestein

Ultrac Pro

7.2
R18 – R22
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
8
3
3
Best position
#3
#2
#2
Average position
8.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
64
60
34

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison