18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Test Profile

Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Number of tests
8
3
3
Best position
#3
#2
#1
Average position
8.0
3.3
4.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
64
40
54

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison