Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Vredestein

Ultrac Pro

VS

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

9.8

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Ultrac Pro

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

8

3

Best position

#3

#2

Average position

8.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

64

34

60

Wet

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

89%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

75%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Comfort

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

67%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry handling

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

68%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry braking

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

66%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

77%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Ultrac Pro

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison