18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
8
3
26
Best position
#3
#2
#1
Average position
8.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
64
34
66

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
89%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
67%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
68%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
66%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison