Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Premium

Vredestein

Ultrac Pro

VS

ZV7

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.7

R17 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Ultrac Pro

ZV7

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Number of tests

8

11

3

Best position

#3

#8

#1

Average position

8.0

18.5

4.0

Latest test

2026

2023

2026

Available sizes

64

278

54

Wet

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

79%

Avon ZV7

76%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Wet handling

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

74%

Avon ZV7

85%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

89%

Avon ZV7

79%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Wet braking

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

72%

Avon ZV7

74%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

88%

Avon ZV7

60%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

75%

Avon ZV7

74%

Comfort

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

85%

Avon ZV7

82%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Exterior noise

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

85%

Avon ZV7

82%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Dry

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

67%

Avon ZV7

79%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Dry handling

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

68%

Avon ZV7

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Dry braking

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

66%

Avon ZV7

75%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Costs

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

77%

Avon ZV7

59%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

77%

Avon ZV7

69%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ultrac Pro

ZV7

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison