18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Test Profile

Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Avon
ZV7
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Number of tests
8
11
3
Best position
#3
#8
#1
Average position
8.0
18.5
4.0
Latest test
2026
2023
2026
Available sizes
64
278
54

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%
Avon ZV7
76%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Avon ZV7
85%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
89%
Avon ZV7
79%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
72%
Avon ZV7
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
88%
Avon ZV7
60%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75%
Avon ZV7
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Avon ZV7
82%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Avon ZV7
82%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
67%
Avon ZV7
79%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
68%
Avon ZV7
88%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
66%
Avon ZV7
75%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Avon ZV7
59%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77%
Avon ZV7
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison