Comparison: Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Vredestein

T-Trac 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

T-Trac 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

4

1

3

Best position

#5

#3

#1

#2

Average position

5.0

12.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

24

111

64

34

Wet

Vredestein T-Trac 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein T-Trac 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein T-Trac 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Vredestein T-Trac 2

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein T-Trac 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Vredestein T-Trac 2

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Costs

Vredestein T-Trac 2

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Comfort

Vredestein T-Trac 2

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Vredestein T-Trac 2

52%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Vredestein T-Trac 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

T-Trac 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison