18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Vredestein
T-Trac 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
4
18
3
Best position
#5
#3
#1
#2
Average position
5.0
12.0
6.1
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
24
111
47
34

Wet

Wet
Vredestein T-Trac 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Vredestein T-Trac 2
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Vredestein T-Trac 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein T-Trac 2
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein T-Trac 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Vredestein T-Trac 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein T-Trac 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison