18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Vredestein
T-Trac 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
3
2
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
5.0
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
24
40
23

Wet

Wet
Vredestein T-Trac 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet braking
Vredestein T-Trac 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Wet handling
Vredestein T-Trac 2
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein T-Trac 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein T-Trac 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein T-Trac 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Vredestein T-Trac 2
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison