18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Vredestein
T-Trac 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
14
3
Best position
#5
#8
#2
Average position
5.0
13.4
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
24
153
34

Wet

Wet
Vredestein T-Trac 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Vredestein T-Trac 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Vredestein T-Trac 2
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein T-Trac 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein T-Trac 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein T-Trac 2
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Vredestein T-Trac 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein T-Trac 2
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Vredestein T-Trac 2
52%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison