18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Vredestein
Sportrac 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
9
4
15
Best position
#1
#3
#2
Average position
7.8
12.0
9.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
57
111
225

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Sportrac 5
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Sportrac 5
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Sportrac 5
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Vredestein Sportrac 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Sportrac 5
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Vredestein Sportrac 5
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Sportrac 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
Vredestein Sportrac 5
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry handling
Vredestein Sportrac 5
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry braking
Vredestein Sportrac 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Sportrac 5
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Vredestein Sportrac 5
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Sportrac 5
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Fuel efficiency
Vredestein Sportrac 5
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Price/value
Vredestein Sportrac 5
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Sportrac 5
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Sportrac 5
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
Vredestein Sportrac 5
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison