Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Vredestein

Sportrac 5

R14 – R18

VS

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Sportrac 5

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Number of tests

9

4

1

Best position

#1

#3

#1

Average position

7.8

12.0

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

57

111

64

Wet

Vredestein Sportrac 5

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein Sportrac 5

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein Sportrac 5

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Vredestein Sportrac 5

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein Sportrac 5

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Vredestein Sportrac 5

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Costs

Vredestein Sportrac 5

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Vredestein Sportrac 5

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein Sportrac 5

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dry

Vredestein Sportrac 5

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Vredestein Sportrac 5

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Vredestein Sportrac 5

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Vredestein Sportrac 5

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Vredestein Sportrac 5

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Sportrac 5

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison