18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Vredestein
Sportrac 5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
9
10
4
Best position
#1
#2
#3
Average position
7.8
6.0
12.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
57
104
111

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Sportrac 5
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Sportrac 5
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Sportrac 5
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet handling
Vredestein Sportrac 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Sportrac 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet braking
Vredestein Sportrac 5
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Sportrac 5
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Mileage
Vredestein Sportrac 5
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Sportrac 5
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Sportrac 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry handling
Vredestein Sportrac 5
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry braking
Vredestein Sportrac 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Sportrac 5
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Sportrac 5
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison