Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Vredestein

Sportrac 5

R14 – R18

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Sportrac 5

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

9

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

7.8

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

57

34

64

Wet

Vredestein Sportrac 5

80%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein Sportrac 5

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Vredestein Sportrac 5

85%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein Sportrac 5

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein Sportrac 5

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet braking

Vredestein Sportrac 5

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Costs

Vredestein Sportrac 5

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Vredestein Sportrac 5

83%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein Sportrac 5

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dry

Vredestein Sportrac 5

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Vredestein Sportrac 5

91%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Vredestein Sportrac 5

85%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Vredestein Sportrac 5

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Vredestein Sportrac 5

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Sportrac 5

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison