18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

This comparison looks at two popular all‑season tyres tested repeatedly by AUTO BILD, ADAC and independent reviewers: the Vredestein Quatrac and the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3. Manufacturer pages: Vredestein and Goodyear. Neither model is listed as replaced by a newer tyre in our data.


Summary of test results


Across multiple AUTO BILD test runs, the Vredestein Quatrac regularly finished in the top group (positions like 2 and 5 in large comparatives) and scores especially high for wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, low exterior noise and balanced comfort. ADAC placed the Quatrac mid‑pack (6/16) in one test. Our consolidated internal rating for the Quatrac is 94%, reflecting an overall very strong, balanced profile.


The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 repeatedly ranks among the front runners as well (AUTO BILD positions around 4–6, ADAC test winner at 1/16 and strong TyreReviews results). Test highlights are excellent snow traction and braking, very good wet handling, high predicted mileage and low rolling resistance. Our consolidated rating for the Goodyear is 81%, showing it as an excellent snow‑oriented all‑season tyre with strengths in economy and longevity.


Strengths & weaknesses



  • Vredestein Quatrac — Strengths: outstanding wet performance (wet handling and braking), impressive aquaplaning reserves, quiet ride and good dry braking/handling. Works as a true all‑rounder in mixed conditions.

  • Vredestein — Weaknesses: slightly higher rolling resistance and average longevity in some tests; mixed ADAC placement suggests it is not always the outright winter mileage leader.

  • Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 — Strengths: class‑leading snow behaviour (traction and braking), excellent wet characteristics in several tests, predicted high mileage and low rolling resistance, often rewarded with top test positions (including ADAC winner).

  • Goodyear — Weaknesses: occasional slight compromises on dry braking length and a modest penalty in noise in some comparatives; our consolidated score is lower than the Quatrac despite strong niche advantages.


Head‑to‑head in mutual tests


When compared directly in the same test suites, the two tyres trade places depending on the focus: the Quatrac often leads on overall balance, low noise and wet safety laps, while the Vector Gen‑3 is frequently superior in winter/snow metrics, rolling resistance and predicted mileage. ADAC and TyreReviews trend in favour of the Goodyear for winter performance and longevity; AUTO BILD tests frequently rank the Vredestein among the very best for wet/dry balance.


Verdict — which to choose?


If you want a highly balanced all‑season tyre that prioritises wet safety, low noise and driving comfort, the Vredestein Quatrac is the better all‑round pick (our higher overall rating). If your driving includes frequent winter conditions, long mileage expectations and you value snow traction, fuel economy and predicted longevity, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 is the stronger specialist choice. Both are excellent options; choose based on whether you prioritise all‑round balance (Vredestein) or winter/economy strengths (Goodyear).

Test Profile

Vredestein
Quatrac
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Number of tests
16
28
14
Best position
#1
#1
#7
Average position
3.1
3.9
11.6
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
86
210
109

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Vredestein
Quatrac
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
82%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius AS2
61%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Wet Braking
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
75%
Toyo Celsius AS2
49%
Wet Handling
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
84%
Toyo Celsius AS2
50%
Wet Circle Cornering
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
82%
Toyo Celsius AS2
57%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein Quatrac
78%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
79%
Toyo Celsius AS2
70%
Aquaplaning Cross
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
88%
Toyo Celsius AS2
80%
Dry Performance
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
Vredestein
Quatrac
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
74%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius AS2
67%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Dry Braking
Vredestein Quatrac
75%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
64%
Toyo Celsius AS2
70%
Dry Handling
Vredestein Quatrac
78%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
84%
Toyo Celsius AS2
64%
Snow Performance
Vredestein Quatrac
74%
Vredestein
Quatrac
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
86%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius AS2
63%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Snow Braking
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
88%
Toyo Celsius AS2
71%
Snow Traction
Vredestein Quatrac
74%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
88%
Toyo Celsius AS2
55%
Snow Handling
Vredestein Quatrac
73%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
83%
Toyo Celsius AS2
58%
Snow Circle Cornering
Vredestein Quatrac
68%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
83%
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Comfort & Noise
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
Vredestein
Quatrac
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
78%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius AS2
74%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Noise Exterior
Vredestein Quatrac
80%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
74%
Toyo Celsius AS2
74%
Ride Comfort
Vredestein Quatrac
73%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
82%
Toyo Celsius AS2
73%
Economy
Vredestein Quatrac
68%
Vredestein
Quatrac
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
76%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius AS2
70%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein Quatrac
70%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
74%
Toyo Celsius AS2
59%
Mileage
Vredestein Quatrac
65%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
78%
Toyo Celsius AS2
81%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
All season
2024225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2023225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2022195/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison