Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Vredestein

Quatrac Pro

VS

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato All Season SF3

Test Profile

Quatrac Pro

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

12

10

3

Best position

#2

Average position

5.2

6.0

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

103

104

40

Wet

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet handling

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Wet braking

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet performance

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry performance

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Snow

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

61%

Snow traction

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

65%

Snow braking

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

66%

Snow handling

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

65%

Snow cornering

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

70%

Comfort

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Comfort

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Interior noise

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Costs

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Mileage

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Quatrac Pro

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison