18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro EV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
3
10
Best position
#3
#2
#2
Average position
3.0
3.3
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
18
40
104

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Snow

Snow
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
62%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry handling
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison