18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Vredestein Comtrac 2 WinterPremium
VredesteinVredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

R15 – R16
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Vredestein
Comtrac 2 Winter
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
10
3
Best position
#4
#2
#2
Average position
4.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
13
104
34

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Snow

Snow
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
43%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
47%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
47%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Ice

Ice
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison