Comparison: Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Vredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

R15 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Comtrac 2 Winter

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

2

3

2

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

4.0

3.7

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

13

34

40

23

Dry

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

72%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry lane changing

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry steering response

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

92%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dry handling

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet handling

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

78%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet braking

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

89%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Snow

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

43%

Comfort

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

47%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

47%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Costs

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

62%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

62%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Ice

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Comtrac 2 Winter

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison