18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

Vredestein
Comtrac 2 Winter
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
2
3
15
Best position
#4
#2
#1
Average position
4.0
3.7
1.2
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
13
34
122

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
72%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Dry steering response
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Dry handling
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Dry lane changing
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
86%

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Wet braking
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Wet handling
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%

Snow

Snow
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
43%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
47%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
47%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
62%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
62%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
79%

Ice

Ice
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison