Comparison: Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Vredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

R15 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Comtrac 2 Winter

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

2

14

15

3

Best position

#4

#8

#2

Average position

4.0

13.4

9.0

3.3

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

13

153

225

40

Dry

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry driving behavior

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Dry handling

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry performance

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Wet

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Wet braking

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet circle cornering

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet handling

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Wet performance

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Snow

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

43%

Comfort

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

47%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

47%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Interior noise

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Costs

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Fuel efficiency

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Rolling resistance

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Mileage

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Ice

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Comtrac 2 Winter

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison