Comparison: Viking WinTech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Viking

WinTech

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

WinTech

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Number of tests

6

14

3

5

1

Best position

#11

#1

#2

#1

Average position

20.8

3.6

3.3

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

59

188

40

63

64

Wet

Viking WinTech

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking WinTech

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Viking WinTech

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking WinTech

46%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Viking WinTech

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet performance

Viking WinTech

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Snow

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow braking

Viking WinTech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Snow traction

Viking WinTech

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snow handling

Viking WinTech

47%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow cornering

Viking WinTech

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dry

Viking WinTech

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Viking WinTech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry performance

Viking WinTech

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Comfort

Viking WinTech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Viking WinTech

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Interior noise

Viking WinTech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Comfort

Viking WinTech

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Viking WinTech

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Viking WinTech

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Ice

Viking WinTech

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking WinTech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

WinTech

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison