18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Vredestein
Quatrac Pro EV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
5
1
14
Best position
#11
#3
#8
Average position
17.0
3.0
13.4
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
18
153

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
62%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison