18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Viking WinTech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Viking Fourtech

Viking

Fourtech

VS

Viking WinTech

Viking

WinTech

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Viking

Fourtech

Viking

WinTech

Falken

e.Ziex

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

5

6

3

14

24

Best position

#11

#11

#2

#1

#1

Average position

17.0

20.8

3.7

3.6

2.7

Latest test

2021

2024

2025

2025

2025

Available sizes

32

59

34

188

302

Wet

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Viking WinTech

55%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Viking WinTech

52%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

61%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Viking WinTech

62%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Viking WinTech

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Viking WinTech

46%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Snow

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Viking WinTech

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Viking WinTech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Viking WinTech

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

47%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Costs

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Viking WinTech

72%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Viking WinTech

67%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Comfort

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Viking WinTech

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Viking WinTech

61%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Dry

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Viking WinTech

63%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Viking WinTech

62%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison