18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SPremium
MichelinMichelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

9.7
R18 – R23
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
5
10
15
Best position
#11
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
2.1
9.0
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
195
225

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison