Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato All Season SF3

Test Profile

Fourtech

CrossClimate 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

5

24

3

1

5

Best position

#11

#1

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

2.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2021

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

151

40

64

63

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Fourtech

CrossClimate 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison