18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUVPremium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

8.9
R17 – R22
Laufenn G Fit 4SBudget
LaufennLaufenn

G Fit 4S

6.4
R13 – R17
Also compare with
Cinturato All Season SF3 Quatrac CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Laufenn
G Fit 4S
Number of tests
5
2
5
Best position
#11
#1
#10
Average position
17.0
1.5
14.8
Latest test
2021
2024
2025
Available sizes
32
54
4

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
81%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
69%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
84%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
70%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
57%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
75%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
66%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
72%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
88%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
56%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison