Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Viking (0%). The first tyre test of Viking Fourtech was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Fourtech and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Viking Fourtech
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Viking Fourtech Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2- | ||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 43,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37,6 | 53,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
