Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

ION FlexClimate

9.0

R17 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Fourtech

Ecsta PS71

ION FlexClimate

Number of tests

5

15

1

Best position

#11

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

9.0

1.0

Latest test

2021

2025

Available sizes

32

225

27

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate

Fourtech

Ecsta PS71

ION FlexClimate

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison