Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Hankook

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

Ventus Prime 4

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

Number of tests

5

13

3

24

Best position

#11

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

6.2

3.7

3.3

2.7

Latest test

2021

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

530

34

40

150

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Fourtech

Ventus Prime 4

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison